Much like the UN's credibility, this cluster bomb seems to be hanging by a thread.
But, for starters, is it really likely that it landed there by itself? Or is it more likely that someone identified it as a dud and hung it from a tree?
And secondly, how's this for moral equivalence: Is there ANY distinction between Israel "raining down cluster bombs when a cease-fire was in sight," and Hezbullah "firing rockets at Haifa
AFTER THE CEASE-FIRE WENT INTO EFFECT?"
Why is one REGULARLY condemned in bylines by the
useful idiots dhimmis in Europe, and one REGULARLY ignored?
Jan Egeland, who according to the caption accompanying this picture, is shocked and appalled at Israel's "completely immoral" behavior.
Jan presumably has no problem whatsoever with terrorists hiding behind civilians, as he has yet to utter a single word condemning that behavior. (Correction: As pointed out by
reader "truth squad," Jan Egeland has in fact
condemned that behavior:
But a day after criticizing Israel for "disproportionate" strikes against civilians, U.N. humanitarian chief Jan Egeland accused Hezbollah of "cowardly blending" among Lebanese civilians.
Thanks for pointing that out, TS. Sorry for the mistake on my part!)
Figures.
Tags: mohammed zaatari
AP
#Israel/Lebanon War 2006
Comments:
I can see where this guy, after some determination was made that this bomb was a dud, took it out to his orchard and hung it in a tree for a nice PR move.
LOL.. I like your analogy... hanging by a thread. Funny stuff that.
Yes, it is true that Mr. England criticized Hezballah, but his main directives (and most of them) were directed at Isreal when he made his grand tour to Lebanon. Note the difference in word choice.
To Hezbos: "Jan Egeland accused Hezbollah of "cowardly blending" among Lebanese civilians."... cowardly. This to a group of terrorist thugs who wish death to their children.
To Isreal: "Jan Egeland is shocked and appalled at Israel's "completely immoral" behavior."..... shocked, appalled, immoral. This directed at a duly elected government that actively (and uncalled for) made provisions to reduce civilian deaths.
This is like Murtha saying al-quaeda is evil, but then turn around and direct 95% of his vilest and most treasonist comments at our own military.